<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Nokia's market share, a good sign of things to come...</title>
		<description>Comments for Nokia's market share, a good sign of things to come... at http://www.nokiausers.net , comment 0 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.nokiausers.net</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:04:12 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.nokiausers.net/General/Nokia-s-market-share-a-good-sign-of-things-to-come.html#pc_192</link>
			<description>I meant &quot;marketing&quot; (not marking).
 - davidm</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:06:03 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>why is this &quot;a good sign of things to come...&quot;</title>
			<link>http://www.nokiausers.net/General/Nokia-s-market-share-a-good-sign-of-things-to-come.html#pc_191</link>
			<description>When companies get big, they get complacent. They don't feel obliged to be competitive, instead marking takes over. I feel no faith for nor do I have any vested interest in Nokia being successful. It's not like they provide lifetime device software updates. If Nokia comes out with new mapping software for &quot;N series,&quot; it very likely won't work on my n95; they'll expect me to buy a whole new device for one feature. Nokia can't even be bothered to roll out n95 updates consistently (it can't be rocket science). Instead, when my device no longer does what I need, I will look for the best solution from any company, because it's clear Nokia is simply operating on that basis, offering 'disposable' solutions, rather than lifetime/lifestyle solutions.
 - davidm</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:03:58 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
